I just started reading Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem. I’m not very far into it. It’s clear that she has a laser-like mind that is an excellent bullshit detector. However, one thing that actually surprised me is how simple her writing is. The ideas inherent in her work are complex, but they are delivered clearly and directly. Occasionally she will use a German or Jewish word without explanation, and you would need to have at least a basic level of history, but aside from that her work is very easy to read. It might not be as direct as Orwell, few are, but it’s not far behind. So many times really intelligent academics use language that is impenetrable to anyone outside of their field. Sometimes, as having written a peer reviewed chapter in a book myself, the form dictates such language. Often however, I think this is due to the individuals either inability to write clearly, just because you are a genius in biology does not make you a great writer, or because whoever has been in their field so long that they forget that most people don’t understand the basics of what they are talking about. But if you again read someone like Orwell, who said to never use a big word where a small one will do, you understand that extremely complex and powerful ideas can be conveyed with the simplest of language. If you are writing poetry or some kind of fictional prose that has a poetic element to it, then I understand trying to be flowery with language. However, if the main purpose of your writing is to convey some kind of idea, then there is simply no need to further complicate things with the kind of language that is used. In the worst case scenario you are extremely limiting the amount of people that can understand the ideas inherit in your work, and in the best case, you are just simply boring the shit out of someone while they try to grasp whatever it is you are saying.