This is another article from the always interesting Matt Taibbi, about not only the movie American Sniper, but also the way Hollywood distorts war.
I have read several books about how the military influences the outcome of movies and how entertainment is taking over every aspect of life. On the first subject, a real simple fact: The military will give access to military equipment to productions that paint the military in a favorable light. If a production does not paint the military in a favorable light, they will not get that access, which in turn can often lead to increased budgets. As I do not know the backstory, although it very well may pertain to this film, this is not to imply that this is the case with American Sniper.
My point in any post is not to pass judgment on a film I have not seen, nor to present facts that I don’t know. I simply want people to think critically when going to movies that have a political nature to them. Movies take millions of dollars to get made. What is a movie trying to say? Who benefits both monetarily and ideologically from a film? If the movie is a fictionalized version of real events, what are the distortions and why were they made? These kinds of questions and more should be asked when seeing a movie of any political stripe.
And yes I said I would not put up any more thoughts having to do with American Sniper until I had seen it. However, I thought this article was too thought provoking not to share. I also think that it deals with ideas and themes outside the orbit of that single film.