Werner Herzog On TV and Commercials

Our grandchildren will blame us for not tossing hand-grenades into TV stations because of commercials. Television kills our imagination and what we end up with are worn out images because of the inability of too many people to seek out fresh ones.”

Werner Herzog

If you would like to read more quotes by the German director you can find some at:


If you are even the slightest bit interested in Herzog, the book Herzog On Herzog is a completely engaging read. 

“The Conformist”: An unsettling political masterpiece returns

“The Conformist”: An unsettling political masterpiece returns http://www.salon.com/2014/08/28/the_conformist_an_unsettling_political_masterpiece_returns/ via @Salon

This article in Salon made me really want to see this movie.  It is also nice to see a long form piece about a work when so many reviews are becoming shorter and shorter. 

The Movie Prometheus and Mythology

This blog includes big spoilers for the movie Prometheus.  

I must admit that I am fascinated with the movie Prometheus.  It is directed by Ridley Scott and it is an indirect prequel to the movie Alien.  I saw it twice in theaters and I seem to watch it every time it has come on TV this week.

First, I’m not saying that there are not problems with this movie.  The characters often have lapses in judgment that you would normally see in B horror movies.  Also the end, now that I have seen it several times, is really just a more serious version of the ending of Almost Heroes; yes the movie starring Chris Farley.  In the Farley comedy once the characters, who are racing Lewis and Clark to the Pacific Ocean, reach the Pacific Ocean, they decide to keep walking to Asia.  They decide to do this despite going through 90 minutes of comedy hell. The character of Dr. Shaw in the movie Prometheus, despite having just endured imaginable horrors, decides at the end to go further into the alien world that she has discovered.  They say that comedy is when a hero goes to the innermost cave and learns nothing.

However, I think I like this movie for two reasons.  First is that director Ridley Scott always puts the money on screen.  Whenever you see one of his big budget movies you are seeing something original and unique that you don’t see anywhere else.  Just the design aesthetic of this movie is incredible.  Also the creatures and aliens in this movie are actually really creepy.  A great deal of horror and science fiction are suspenseful only to lose credibility when you actually see the thing you are supposed to be afraid of.  The scene in the sick bay, where Dr. Shaw is trying to get rid of the alien inside her is one of the few times in recent memory I can remember actually squirming in a theater.

Second, I think that they created an interesting and complex mythology for this film.  In movies in the science fiction genre, or horror or fantasy, it is not important that these movies adhere to the rules of reality, so much that they create a unique world with its own rules.  The movie is deep, but not deep in the sense that one would usually use the term.  The movie does ask religious and philosophical questions, but I find them to be somewhat superficial and again that is not really what I’m talking about.  I mean that the film is deep in that its world has many layers to it that make it interesting.  It has a mythology in it to the point that your imagination takes you to places that aren’t being shown on screen.  The movie creates a three dimensional world, that however horrific, is different from our own and is something you can get temporarily lost in.  That to me is entertainment.


Monday Morning Fun

I thought I would provide some fun for those of you that will be reading this early Monday morning at work. I was watching Lethal Weapon and within 30 seconds Danny Glover said the classic action movie line, “I’m too old for this shit.” If you haven’t seen it here is a Movie Supercut showing how many times variations of this line has been used. Tell your boss you are too old for this shit! Enoy…

Under the Skin: A Second Look

Although I can say with all certainty that the new movie Under the Skin is not for everyone, I can’t stop thinking about it.  If you want to know what it is about read my review from a few days ago.  It is cinema at its best, where imagery is painterly and infused with multiple layers of meeting.  One can’t help but look at the world in a new light, at least if you are open to this kind of film.  It is a slow movie, but this pace is rewarding as it causes you to contemplate the images being shown. 

Scarlett Johansson is an alien, but as this character she forces us to see the world in a way that we might not otherwise.  The world, stripped of its context and meaning that we impart on it, is a strange and mysterious place. 

One of the interesting things in the movie is the men that she seduces.  They have thick Scottish accents.  The accents are so thick that at times I had trouble discerning what they were saying.  Here they were speaking the same language as me, but they appeared foreign, as if inhabiting some familiar but parallel universe. 
Also, the natural world is presented as I believe it really is, as a world we rarely seen in nature documentaries that want to explain and categorize it.  Nature is beautiful and enchanting, but it is also dangerous beyond human comprehension on many levels.

Again, this movie is not for everyone.  It requires work out of the viewer.  In some ways it is more like going to an art museum than the traditional Hollywood fair.  However, if you are up to the challenge, you will see something unique.  It is if the director, Jonathan Glazer, opened up a small glimpse to the mysterious heart of the universe. 

Subversive Popcorn Movies

Sometimes popcorn movies can be every bit as stimulating, if not more so, than serious movies.  There are movies that I have seen that try to convey a serious political message, but they end up failing, because they tell a sort of journalistic truth.  They might tell you what happened and when, but they leave out any kind of ecstatic truth of the human condition, and therefore fail to leave a deeper emotional impression on you. 

I remember seeing the movie Syriana and coming away with very little of an impression from it.  It was a movie that tried to convey our political and moral failings in the Middle East.  But anyone with half a brain knows that we acted immorally at times under the Bush administration.  If you are going to make a political film you need one that makes you feel strongly, as well as think.  The purpose of a political feature film is to make you think, but the best ones always draw you in on some kind of deeper emotional level.  At the very least, as film is largely a visual medium, they should have some kind of stark images that imprint themselves upon the imagination. 

Meanwhile, popcorn movies chief concern is to entertain.  If something is entertaining and fun you are likely to come back to it.  The best directors of popcorn movies, like Paul Verhoeven, can paint outside the lines and include subversive imagery and ideas while putting trashy entertainment at the forefront.  The movie Starship Troopers, if you are an action or sci-fi fan, is a great movie to watch every once in awhile.  The movie is, on surface level, about a futuristic army fighting aliens that look like giant bugs.  However, Verhoeven’s movie touches on all kinds of ideas concerning society and how it militarizes itself. 

The society in Starship Troopers is a fascist society.  Only citizens that have performed some kind of government service can vote.  The young good looking actors are often dressed in uniforms that resemble Nazi uniforms of the 1930’s and 40’s.  Often in war we dehumanize our enemies so that we can kill them.  The enemies in Starship Troopers are literally bugs and this is meant as a metaphor for this process of dehumanization.  Almost all of the grown-ups in this movie are scarred or maimed, several missing limbs, and they send the young beautiful kids off to war.  The movie also features several humorous and subversive commercials that are based on old World War II propaganda pieces. (I’ll include an attachment of one at the end.)   

When I would see absurdities concerning the War on Terror, I often think of something like Starship Troopers more than I would think of a more serious movie like SyrianaStarship Troopers is not high art.  But because its chief manifest is to entertain, it pulls you in and you remember it.  It also uses a fantastic setting to create absurdities that point to the absurd in our own culture.  I’m not saying that popcorn movies should have a higher place in our culture than serious movies.  I do think in this case, if you look at what they are trying to achieve, I think Starship Troopers is more successful than Syriana.  However, I’m simply trying to say that you shouldn’t discount popcorn movies as being a place where meaningful social commentary can happen.  There are clearly plenty of movies that are meant to entertain that even fail at that.  But put in the right hands a genre movie can be a great way to slip a subversive message to a large audience. 




Notice that there is a guy in the above Starship Troopers commercial that says the, “The only good bug is a dead bug.”  General Phil Sheridan said during the Indian Wars that, “The only good Indian is a dead Indian.”  I also love in this commercial when the kids are stepping on bugs at the end as they are being taught to hate the enemy.  This is good fun subversive stuff packed into an action sci-fi movie.  

The Failure to Adapt

I saw the movie Glengarry Glen Ross last night for the first time.  It was a portrayal of the sales world that, although highly exaggerated in its language, rang too true in many cases.  I worked in sales and customer service for about six years.  My brother, who commented on the film’s depressing outlook, was also laughing at some of the darkly comic dialogue.  Meanwhile I felt my blood pressure going up as I relived certain situations that I have seen.

The movie tells the story of people in a real estate sales office.  In the beginning of the film Alec Baldwin, who plays a character that represents upper management, comes into the sales office and gives them an epic dressing down for their poor sales performances.  This sets the train of events that takes place in the movie and includes arguments, lying, and thievery.

The David Mamet play that this movie was based on was first performed in 1983 and the movie came out in 1992.  I don’t know how offices were in those years, but knowing how they are now, I knew that the dialogue was an exaggeration.  This movie has so many fucks in it that it became known to the cast as “Death of a fucking salesman.” In the neutered politically correct corporate world of today this kind of outwardly expression of vulgarity would never take place.  Sure, it might take place at moments or in some companies, but over all people would not be allowed to talk to each other like that.  However, this does not mean that the dialogue is untrue.  In its absurd exaggeration it exposes the feelings that I have seen in many coworkers and bosses.  It takes what often is going on inside in reality and moves it outside.

Earlier today I read an article about Hirdoo Onoda.  Onada was a Japanese soldier on a remote island in the Philippines that fought World War II for 29 years after the Japanese surrendered.  He believed that the war was still being fought so many years after it was over.  During this time he killed around 30 islanders who he believed to be enemy combatants.

Watching the movie, and watching these alpha males fight over such pathetic rewards, I couldn’t help but think that in our society we often behave in ways that are historically obsolete.  The men in this movie, and so many people in the business world, have some kind of delusion that they are part of some kind of lost warrior clan.  They are fighting and competing in ways that have no basis for what is needed in the modern world.  They are debasing their own and others dignity for nothing more than Willy Loman’s gold watch.  They behave with the ruthlessness of some kind of ancient guerilla general all for a couple extra bucks and a bigger desk.

In a global world with such global problems as climate change we must seek to see each other’s basic humanity.  The competition of tribes and clans, which the unfettered market still fosters in us, is out of date and will lead to our destruction.  Trouble always arises in the world when times change, but people fail to adapt.